| Accumulated total postharvest rating of clones | ||||||||
| WA | ID | OR | 3 State av. | |||||
| Rating | Rating | Rating | Rating | |||||
| Clone | Total § | Discard §§ | Total § | Discard §§ | Total * | Discard §§ | Total | |
| 1 | Ranger Russet | 27.4 | 22.6 | 44° | 12.6 | 20.9 | ||
| 2 | Russet Burbank | 28.4 | 22.1 | 11.1 (15.1/35) | 20.5 | |||
| 3 | A89219-7 | 26.3 | 26.4 | 44° | 16.2 | 23.0 | ||
| 4 | A9045-7 | 23.2 | 44° | 21.2 | 44° | 9.0 | 44° | 17.8 |
| 5 | A90586-11 | 23.1 | 44° | 21.1 | 44° | 9.2 | 17.8 | |
| 6 | AO90014-1 | 23.9 | 33.6 | 13.4 | 23.6 | |||
| 7 | AO92017-6 | 26.4 | 31.6 | 20.3 | 26.1 | |||
| § maximum rating possible = 35 | ||||||||
| §§ Values for the indicated evaluation is lower than the rejection level of the evaluation criteria | ||||||||
| * Except as indicated, all clones from OR are scored out of 25 points due to insufficient tubers for fry color and sugar evaluations after storage at 48°F. This adjustment is reflected in the 3 state average ratings out of 31.7 total possible. | ||||||||
| Overall Postharvest Performance of Clones Compared to Russet Burbank. | ||||||||
| Clone | WA | ID | OR | Average | ||||
| 1 | Ranger Russet | L | H | H | H | |||
| 3 | A89219-7 | L | H | H | H | |||
| 4 | A9045-7 | L | L | L | L | |||
| 5 | A90586-11 | L | L | L | L | |||
| 6 | AO90014-1 | L | H | H | H | |||
| 7 | AO92017-6 | L | H | H | H | |||
| H= Higher than Russet Burbank | ||||||||
| L= Lower than Russet Burbank | ||||||||
| S = Same as Russet Burbank | ||||||||
| * Overall rating of clones from OR does not include fry color and sugars after storage at 48°F due to a lack of tubers. | ||||||||