| WA | ID | OR | 3 State av. | ||||||||
| Rating | Rating | Rating | Rating | ||||||||
| Clone | Total § | Discard §§ | Total § | Discard §§ | Total § | Discard §§ | Total | ||||
| 1 | Ranger Russet | 24.2 | 31.8 | 9.0 | 21.7 | ||||||
| 2 | Russet Burbank | 19.1 | 26.5 | 8.9 | Sp. Gr., 44°F | 18.2 | |||||
| 3 | A95409-1 | 21.5 | 28.5 | 11.3 | 20.4 | ||||||
| 4 | A96023-6 | 28.3 | 31.4 | 6.8 | Sp. Gr. | 22.2 | |||||
| 5 | A96095-3 | 24.5 | 27.4 | 21.5 | Sp. Gr. | 24.5 | |||||
| 6 | A96104-2 | 25.1 | 28.5 | 12.3 | Sp. Gr. | 22.0 | |||||
| 7 | A98295-3TE | 21.2 | 21.4 | 14.0 | Sp. Gr. | 18.9 | |||||
| 8 | AO96164-1 | 31.7 | 32.8 | 22.7 | Sp. Gr. | 29.1 | |||||
| 9 | AOA95154-1 | 35.7 | 36.9 | 22.5 | 31.7 | ||||||
| 10 | AOA95155-7 | 29.6 | 32.9 | 12.4 | 25.0 | ||||||
| 11 | COA96054-3 | 27.4 | 30.8 | 23.4 | 27.2 | ||||||
| 12 | PA97B3-2 | 31.4 | 33.5 | 18.4 | Sp. Gr. | 27.8 | |||||
| Average | 26.6 | 30.2 | 15.3 | 24.0 | |||||||
| § maximum rating possible = 38 | |||||||||||
| §§ Values for the indicated evaluation are lower than the rejection level. | |||||||||||
| Overall Postharvest Performance of Clones Compared to Russet Burbank. | |||||||||||
| Clone | WA | ID | OR | Average | |||||||
| 1 | Ranger Russet | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 3 | A95409-1 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 4 | A96023-6 | H | H | L | H | ||||||
| 5 | A96095-3 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 6 | A96104-2 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 7 | A98295-3TE | H | L | H | H | ||||||
| 8 | AO96164-1 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 9 | AOA95154-1 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 10 | AOA95155-7 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 11 | COA96054-3 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 12 | PA97B3-2 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| H= Higher than Russet Burbank | |||||||||||
| L= Lower than Russet Burbank | |||||||||||