| Accumulated Total Postharvest Rating of Clones | |||||||||||
| WA | ID | OR | 3 State av. | ||||||||
| Rating | Rating | Rating | Rating | ||||||||
| Clone | Total § | Discard §§ | Total § | Discard §§ | Total § | Discard §§ | Total | ||||
| 1 | Ranger Russet | 16.2 | 29.4 | 26.0 | 23.9 | ||||||
| 2 | Russet Burbank | 18.1 | 23.2 | Sp. Gr. | 17.2 | 19.5 | |||||
| 3 | A96023-6 | 12.0 | Sp. Gr. 44°F | 31.1 | 18.9 | 20.7 | |||||
| 4 | A96108-12 | 14.5 | 26.3 | 23.5 | 21.4 | ||||||
| 5 | A97142-3 | 30.8 | 30.6 | 29.7 | 30.4 | ||||||
| 6 | A97229-1 | 18.2 | 44°F | 26.2 | Sp. Gr. | 23.2 | Sp. Gr. | 22.5 | |||
| 7 | A97287-6 | 26.4 | 33.8 | 30.4 | 30.2 | ||||||
| 8 | A98104-4 | 24.5 | Sp. Gr. | 29.2 | 24.0 | Sp. Gr. | 25.9 | ||||
| 9 | AO96141-3 | 24.0 | 28.5 | 32.7 | 28.4 | ||||||
| 10 | AO98133-2 | 30.7 | 34.7 | 35.8 | 33.7 | ||||||
| Average | 21.5 | 29.3 | 26.1 | 25.7 | |||||||
| § maximum rating possible = 38 | |||||||||||
| §§ Values for the indicated evaluation are lower than the rejection level. | |||||||||||
| Overall Postharvest Performance of Clones Compared to Russet Burbank. | |||||||||||
| Clone | WA | ID | OR | Average | |||||||
| 1 | Ranger Russet | L | H | H | H | ||||||
| 3 | A96023-6 | L | H | H | H | ||||||
| 4 | A96108-12 | L | H | H | H | ||||||
| 5 | A97142.3 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 6 | A97229-1 | S | H | H | H | ||||||
| 7 | A97287-6 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 8 | A98104-4 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 9 | AO96141-3 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 10 | AO98133-2 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| H= Higher than Russet Burbank | |||||||||||
| S= Same as Russet Burbank | |||||||||||
| L= Lower than Russet Burbank | |||||||||||
