Accumulated Total Postharvest Rating of Clones

                       
    WA ID OR 3 State av.
    Rating     Rating     Rating     Rating
  Clone Total § Discard §§   Total § Discard §§   Total § Discard §§   Total
                       
1 Ranger Russet 21.6     28.0     20.9     23.5
2 Russet Burbank 20.2     16.3     16.1     17.5
3 A95074-6 30.5     28.1     37.0     31.9
4 A95109-1 23.2     19.7 Sp. Gr.   23.3     22.1
5 A95409-1 22.6     24.1     23.4     23.4
6 A96104-2 26.3     30.5     24.3     27.0
7 AC96052-1Ru 32.5     26.5     29.2     29.4
8 AO96141-3 23.0     29.1     23.1     25.1
9 AO96160-3 31.4     28.7     36.1     32.1
10 AO96164-1 34.3     30.4     31.0 Sp. Gr.   31.9
11 AOA95154-1 26.1     35.6     25.9     29.2
12 AOA95155-7 31.0     31.1     19.6 Sp. Gr.   27.2
13 AOTX95265-2ARu 15.4 Sp. Gr.   17.5     12.0 Sp. Gr.   15.0
14 AOTX95265-4Ru 13.1 Sp. Gr.   14.7 Sp. Gr.   11.3 Sp. Gr.   13.0
15 CO94035-15Ru 25.2     28.0 Sp. Gr.   17.6 Sp. Gr.   23.6
16 MWTX2609-4Ru 15.8     20.5     11.2 Sp. Gr.   15.8
17 TXA549-1Ru 22.1     30.3     17.9 Sp. Gr.   23.4
  Average 24.4     25.8     22.3      
§ maximum rating possible = 38                  
§§ Values for the indicated evaluation are lower than the rejection level.          
Overall Postharvest Performance of Clones Compared to Russet Burbank.
                       
  Clone WA   ID   OR   Average
                       
1 Ranger Russet H   H   H   H
3 A95074-6 H   H   H   H
4 A95109-1 H   H   H   H
5 A95409-1 H   H   H   H
6 A96104-2 H   H   H   H
7 AC96052-1Ru H   H   H   H
8 AO96141-3 H   H   H   H
9 AO96160-3 H   H   H   H
10 AO96164-1 H   H   H   H
11 AOA95154-1 H   H   H   H
12 AOA95155-7 H   H   H   H
13 AOTX95265-2ARu L   H   L   L
14 AOTX95265-4Ru L   L   L   L
15 CO94035-15Ru H   H   H   H
16 MWTX2609-4Ru L   H   L   L
17 TXA549-1Ru H   H   H   H
H= Higher than Russet Burbank                  
L= Lower than Russet Burbank                  
S = Same as Russet Burbank