| WA | ID | OR | 3 State av. | ||||||||
| Rating | Rating | Rating | Rating | ||||||||
| Clone | Total § | Discard §§ | Total § | Discard §§ | Total § | Discard §§ | Total | ||||
| 1 | Ranger Russet | 24.3 | 31.3 | 21.0 | 25.5 | ||||||
| 2 | Russet Burbank | 22.2 | 17.2 | Sp. Gr. | 9.7 | 16.4 | |||||
| 3 | A95409-1 | 22.9 | 26.6 | 19.8 | 23.1 | ||||||
| 4 | A96104-2 | 31.2 | 34.1 | 18.0 | Sp. Gr. | 27.8 | |||||
| 5 | A97287-6 | 34.6 | 28.8 | 25.4 | 29.6 | ||||||
| 6 | AC96052-1Ru | 33.7 | 30.6 | 27.5 | 30.6 | ||||||
| 7 | AO96141-3 | 33.6 | 31.5 | 33.7 | 32.9 | ||||||
| 8 | AO96164-1 | 35.5 | 26.5 | 33.3 | 31.8 | ||||||
| 9 | AOA95154-1 | 30.5 | 33.7 | 27.9 | 30.7 | ||||||
| 10 | AOA95155-7 | 28.3 | 31.7 | Sp. Gr. | 19.9 | 26.6 | |||||
| 11 | AOTX95265-3Ru | 17.1 | Sp. Gr. | 17.5 | Sp. Gr. | 8.2 | Sp. Gr. | 14.3 | |||
| 12 | CO97087-2Ru | 34.9 | 28.9 | 28.4 | 30.7 | ||||||
| 13 | TXA549-1Ru | 22.0 | 31.6 | 16.8 | Sp. Gr. | 23.5 | |||||
| Average | 28.5 | 28.5 | 22.3 | ||||||||
| § maximum rating possible = 38 | |||||||||||
| §§ Values for the indicated evaluation are lower than the rejection level. | |||||||||||
| Overall Postharvest Performance of Clones Compared to Russet Burbank. | |||||||||||
| Clone | WA | ID | OR | Average | |||||||
| 1 | Ranger Russet | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 3 | A95409-1 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 4 | A96104-2 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 5 | A97287-6 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 6 | AC96052-1Ru | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 7 | AO96141-3 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 8 | AO96164-1 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 9 | AOA95154-1 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 10 | AOA95155-7 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 11 | AOTX95265-3Ru | L | H | L | L | ||||||
| 12 | CO97087-2Ru | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 13 | TXA549-1Ru | L | H | H | H | ||||||
| H= Higher than Russet Burbank | |||||||||||
| L= Lower than Russet Burbank | |||||||||||
| S = Same as Russet Burbank | |||||||||||