Accumulated Total Postharvest Ratings of Clones

    WA ID OR 3 State av.
    Rating     Rating     Rating     Rating
  Clone Total § Discard §§   Total § Discard §§   Total § Discard §§   Total
                       
1 Ranger Russet 26.0     31.6     21.3     26.3
2 Russet Burbank 28.6     20.5 Sp. Gr.   9.7     19.6
3 A0008-1TE 35.5     24.5     20.9 Sp. Gr.   27.0
4 A96814-65LB 32.7     33.0     24.6     30.1
5 A97066-42LB 25.1     32.7     26.9     28.2
6 A98345-1 31.5     36.1     33.9     33.8
7 A99073-1 26.0     30.3 Sp. Gr.   24.9 Sp. Gr.   27.1
8 AO96305-3 35.9     32.7     32.6     33.7
9 AO96365-2 32.0     31.6     17.9     27.2
10 PA00N14-2 28.8     33.6     17.8     26.7
11 PA00N15-2 25.8     25.5     14.4     21.9
12 PA98NM38-1 27.7     28.1     23.6     26.5
13 PA98NM39-1 18.2     21.3     16.2     18.6
14 PA99N12-1 33.4     36.7     19.1     29.7
15 PA99N2-1 33.0     34.0     17.6     28.2
16 PA99N82-4 35.0     31.8     25.4 Sp. Gr.   30.7
  Average 29.7     30.3     21.7     27.2
§ maximum rating possible = 38                  
§§ Values for the indicated evaluation are lower than the rejection level.          
Overall Postharvest Performance of Clones Compared to Russet Burbank.
                       
  Clone WA   ID   OR   Average
                       
1 Ranger Russet L   H   H   H
3 A0008-1TE H   H   H   H
4 A96814-65LB H   H   H   H
5 A97066-42LB L   H   H   H
6 A98345-1 H   H   H   H
7 A99073-1 L   H   H   H
8 AO96305-3 H   H   H   H
9 AO96365-2 H   H   H   H
10 PA00N14-2 H   H   H   H
11 PA00N15-2 L   H   H   H
12 PA98NM38-1 L   H   H   H
13 PA98NM39-1 L   H   H   L
14 PA99N12-1 H   H   H   H
15 PA99N2-1 H   H   H   H
16 PA99N82-4 H   H   H   H
H= Higher than Russet Burbank                  
S= Same as Russet Burbank                  
L= Lower than Russet Burbank