Letter of recommendation.doc 05/05/04
Frequently,
I am asked to supply a letter of recommendation on behalf of a
student applying to graduate schools, professional schools, or
academic positions. I am happy to do so if I believe my letter will
help by providing an insight beyond the obvious course work and
earned grades. Unfortunately, many students misunderstand the
purpose of such a recommendation.
First-hand, long-term contact The purpose of a recommendation
is to provide the school or potential employer with an evaluation of
your work ethic, dedication, academic strengths, and suitability for
the profession. If you have only taken a course from me, but have
had no other significant or long-term contact, then I have no basis
upon which to provide a credible recommendation. Most schools or
employers will quickly recognize this, and downgrade my
recommendation to irrelevance despite what glowing praises it
contains. Your application most likely will include transcripts and
a cover letter. There is no reason for me to write a letter of
recommendation just to repeat what is obvious from your transcript
of courses and grades.
Letters
based on “impressions” of you in a course are equally useless.
Guesses or hunches about who you are as a person are unfair to you
and misleading to the professional schools. As part of the special
opportunity available at this university, you should in your junior
or senior year avail yourself of research/work experience in one of
the faculty laboratories. And/or you may take the initiative and
link yourself up with a faculty member on a special project (e.g.,
Biol 499). These are enriching and excellent opportunities for you
to get beyond just the experience of a classroom. As a by product,
you will also get to know faculty members better, and they will be
in a credible position to support you later when you apply to
professional or graduate schools. Only when I have the benefit of
such long-term, first-hand knowledge of your academic and personal
character can I agree to write a letter of recommendation.
Otherwise I am merely repeating what is blatantly obvious from your
transcripts.
The
Process and Conditions If we have worked together on a
long-term basis, and you believe that I can provide an honest
evaluation of your qualifications, then we should meet and discuss
the details. However, please be aware of the following:
1)
Lead time.
Please make sure that any letter requested from me includes
sufficient lead-time, measured in weeks not hours. If the deadline
is too near, I may not be able to help.
2)
Template.
I may ask
you to supply me with a “template”, a paragraph or two composed by
you that highlights your academic and personal strengths. Amended
and sorted, I might then be able to incorporate these into my
letter. Such a template allows you to flag for me particular
strengths you feel should pass before the eyes of the reviewing
school. This also helps to educate me as to what the particular
school expects from you the applicant.
3)
Résumé.
You should be
prepared to supply me with a short account of your work,
qualifications, and academic achievements.
4)
Waiver of Rights.
Most
recommendation forms permit you the applicant to waive your right to
easily review a recommendation once it has been submitted as a
confidential document. However, some states have comprehensive laws
allowing an applicant to review confidential letters of
recommendation submitted on their behalf. It is your choice. But it
is also my choice as well to write or not a letter of
recommendation. If an applicant can read such a confidential
document, then whoever fills it out will know this, and write a
letter filled with glowing platitudes and empty praise. In short,
letters of recommendation, open to the applicant, are useless, and I
will not waste my time on them.
5)
Discussion.
Once all is in
place, we should have a discussion and I will provide you with a
general idea of what my letter of recommendation will cover. At
this point, if you are uncomfortable with my comments or wish to
reconsider, then at your suggestion I can withhold my letter with no
prejudice.
Applicant
Review.
Professional and
academic committees that review your application often look for
specific backgrounds and qualifications. I do not, and cannot,
always know what these might be. However, if I notice a feature of
your application that looks weak, and you request it, I will bring
it to your attention before posting any letter of recommendation.
Prof. K. V. Kardong
|