|
|
The status of women
during the Enlightenment changed drastically; surprisingly,
much of the talk concerning individual liberties, social
welfare, economic liberty, and education did not greatly
affect the unequal treatment of women. In many ways, the
position of women was seriously degraded during the
Enlightenment. Economically, the rise of capitalism produced
laws that severely restricted women's rights to own property
and run businesses. While Enlightenment thinkers were
proposing economic freedom and enlightened monarchs were
tearing down barriers to production and trade, women were
being forced out of a variety of businesses throughout
Europe. In 1600, more than two-thirds of the businesses in
London were owned and administered by women; by 1800, that
number had shrunk to less than ten percent.
While the Enlightenment greatly changed
the face of education, the education of women simultaneously
expanded in opportunity but seriously degraded in quality.
In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, education was
available only to the wealthiest women, while education was
available, in theory at least, to most men. But the
education that these select women received was often fairly
equivalent in content and quality to the best education
available to men. The Enlightenment, however, stressed the
absolute importance of education for moral development and
the ideal operation of society. So education was extended to
the women of the upper and middle classes; however,
Enlightenment thinkers also believed that the various
intellectual disciplines, such as science and philosophy,
were meant only for men. These subjects, then, were closed
off to women. Instead women were offered training in
"accomplishments," that is, various skills that contribute
to the moral development and the "display" quality of a
wife: music, drawing, singing, painting, and so on. So while
men were learning the new sciences and philosophies, all
that was offered to women in education was decorative
"accomplishments."
The economies of pre-industrial Europe
were primarily based on family economies; the individual
household was the fundamental unit of economic production.
Within this unit, most of the necessities of life were
produced by members of the family. These family economies
were, by and large, sustenance economies. In this
environment, there was no place for individuals living
outside of a family. If someone lived individually, he or
she was regarded as a criminal or beggar or worse. For both
men and women, then, there really was no alternative,
socially or economically, to living within a family.
Women began to function as productive
laborers within this family economy at the age of six or
seven (sometimes earlier). In agricultural communities, this
meant, usually, light farm labor, and in an artisan's
family, this meant taking part in the business itself. Women
in artisan families were very often trained in the artisanal
skills of the family; as they grew up, they became more
vital and important to the functioning of the business. On
the farm, however, women's labor was considerably less
valued, and women almost always left home between the ages
of eleven and fourteen to either work on another farm or
become a servant in a household.
Very few women could marry without a
dowry. If a woman was part of a family, the family would
usually make up the dowry. If she was on her own, which was
the most typical fate of rural women, then she had to save
enough money to pay her own dowry. This dowry went to the
husband and was invested in the family economy, whether
agricultural or artisanal. That is, the woman was required
to invest in the household economy before she could join
it.
In general, women's lives were oriented
around the eocnomy of the household rather than family. Both
the marriage and the children took second place to
production within the family economy&emdash;this was
absolutely vital, for a bad year in the family economy could
mean starvation.
Nevertheless, the new urban economies of
pre-industrial Europe created low-level, low-wage jobs in
various industries. For both men and women, this work was
brutish, harsh, cruel, and actually paid less than
sustenance wages. While most women stayed within the family
economy, several displaced women found themselves as the
central labor force of pre-industrial industries. In the
illustration below by William Hogarth we see a hemp factory
where women are beating hemp into ropes. The labor is
obviously difficult and the shop steward of the factory can
be seen hovering over the main character with a whip.
|