This appendix reviews previous simulation studies that are relevant to the study of cyclical behavior in the western USA. Let's begin with a question remaining from the previous appendix --- would the UK capacity payment formula have performed well if it were not a convenient lever to be exercised by companies with horizontal market power?
This question was addressed by Bunn and Larsen (1992) using computer simulation. Their model calculated the profitability of new power plants and the lead time to bring the plants on line. The simulations indicated that the UK system was inherently unstable -- reliance on the capacity payments would lead to cycles of under and over capacity and highly volatile pool prices (Bunn 1994; Bunn and Larsen 1992). The volatility was not connected to abuse of the capacity payment formula by PowerGen and National Power, nor was it connected to the "strategic reaction" of the distribution companies. Rather, it was due to a combination of dynamic factors involving the size of the capacity payment, the cost of new generating units, the lead time to bring them on line and limits on investors' ability to see into the future.
| return to opening page of Paper | return to Andy Ford's Home Page |