2000 Late Tri-State Trial

Accumulated total postharvest ratings of clones
    WA     ID     OR     3 State av.
    Rating     Rating     Rating     Rating
  Clone Total § Discard §§   Total § Discard §§   Total § Discard §§   Total 
1 Ranger Russet 16.3 44°   25.6 44°   18.4 44°   20.1
2 Russet Burbank 16.2 44°   18.5 44°   14.3 44°   16.3
3 A89384-10 No Sample     20.3 44°   19.7     20.0
4 A92303-7 15.0 44°   27.5     11.0 Sp. Gr., 44°   17.8
5 AO89128-4.1 21.7     24.0     22.0     22.6
6 AO89128-4.2 29.0     32.9     20.3 44°   27.4
7 AO92007-2 22.6 44°   26.7     17.5 44°   22.3
8 AO92017-6 24.3     27.5     23.2     25.0
9 COO93031-3 21.2 44°   18.1 44°   15.9 Sp. Gr., 44°   18.4
 §maximum rating possible = 35
§§ Values for the indicated evaluation are lower than the rejection level
 
 
Overall Postharvest Performance of Clones Compared to Russet Burbank
   Clone 
WA
ID 
OR 
 Average
Ranger Russet 
H
H
H
H
3 A89384-10
No Sample 
H
H
H
4 A92303-7
L
H
H
5 AO89128-4.1
H
H
H
H
6 AO89128-4.2
H
H
H
H
7 AO92007-2
H
H
H
H
8 AO92017-6
H
H
H
H
9 COO93031-3
H
L
H
H
H=higher than Russet Burbank
L=Lower than Russet Burbank
S=Same as Russet Burbank



This page was created by nora fuller on Friday, February 02, 2001.