| Accumulated Total Postharvest Rating of Clones | |||||||||||
| WA | ID | OR | 3 State av. | ||||||||
| Rating | Rating | Rating | Rating | ||||||||
| Clone | Total § | Discard §§ | Total § | Discard §§ | Total § | Discard §§ | Total | ||||
| 1 | Ranger Russet | 28.5 | 27.3 | 25.2 | 27.0 | ||||||
| 2 | Russet Burbank | 31.3 | 19.9 | 19.2 | 23.5 | ||||||
| 3 | A9045-7 | 26.2 | 29.1 | 18.2 | 24.5 | ||||||
| 4 | A90586-11 | 23.2 | 44°F | 28.1 | 18.8 | 23.4 | |||||
| 5 | A9304-3 | 27.5 | 30.3 | 27.7 | 28.5 | ||||||
| 6 | A9305-10 | 27.5 | 31.3 | 24.5 | 27.8 | ||||||
| 7 | AC92009-4Ru | 23.6 | 23.4 | 21.7 | 22.9 | ||||||
| 8 | ATX9202-1Ru | 25.3 | 26.5 | 21.8 | 24.5 | ||||||
| 9 | CO92077-5Ru | 23.5 | 20.4 | Sp.Gr. | 9.6 | Sp. Gr., 44°F | 17.8 | ||||
| 10 | NDC5372-1Ru | 25.0 | 29.2 | 23.1 | 25.8 | ||||||
| 11 | Stampede Russet | 22.8 | 21.9 | Sp.Gr. | 17.7 | Sp. Gr. | 20.8 | ||||
| 12 | TC1675-1Ru | 33.4 | 29.7 | 30.8 | 31.3 | ||||||
| § maximum rating possible = 35 | |||||||||||
| §§ Values for the indicated evaluation are lower than the rejection level. | |||||||||||
| Overall Postharvest Performance of Clones Compared to Russet Burbank. | |||||||||||
| Clone | WA | ID | OR | Average | |||||||
| 1 | Ranger Russet | L | H | H | H | ||||||
| 3 | A9045-7 | L | H | L | H | ||||||
| 4 | A90586-11 | L | H | L | S | ||||||
| 5 | A9304-3 | L | H | H | H | ||||||
| 6 | A9305-10 | L | H | H | H | ||||||
| 7 | AC92009-4Ru | L | H | H | L | ||||||
| 8 | ATX9202-1Ru | L | H | H | H | ||||||
| 9 | CO92077-5Ru | L | H | L | L | ||||||
| 10 | NDC5372-1Ru | L | H | H | H | ||||||
| 11 | Stampede Russet | L | H | L | L | ||||||
| 12 | TC1675-1Ru | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| H= Higher than Russet Burbank | |||||||||||
| L= Lower than Russet Burbank | |||||||||||
| S = Same as Russet Burbank | |||||||||||