| WA | ID | OR | 3 State av. | ||||||||
| Rating | Rating | Rating | Rating | ||||||||
| Clone | Total § | Discard §§ | Total § | Discard §§ | Total § | Discard §§ | Total | ||||
| 1 | Ranger Russet | 28.2 | 33.3 | 20.2 | 27.2 | ||||||
| 2 | Russet Burbank | 20.9 | 26.2 | Sp. Gr. | 16.0 | 21.0 | |||||
| 3 | A0008-1TE | 34.6 | 26.7 | 25.6 | 29.0 | ||||||
| 4 | A97066-42LB | 31.3 | 30.6 | 20.5 | 27.5 | ||||||
| 5 | AC96052-1Ru | 36.7 | 36.6 | 32.3 | 35.2 | ||||||
| 6 | AO96141-3 | 32.7 | 32.2 | 30.0 | 31.6 | ||||||
| 7 | AOTX95265-4Ru | 17.6 | Sp. Gr. | 19.2 | 6.3 | 14.4 | |||||
| 8 | CO97087-2Ru | 36.4 | 34.3 | 33.8 | 34.8 | ||||||
| 9 | CO98067-7Ru | 20.3 | Sp.Gr. | 23.6 | Sp. Gr. | 11.6 | Sp. Gr. | 18.5 | |||
| 10 | CO98368-2Ru | 27.9 | 19.6 | 16.1 | 21.2 | ||||||
| 11 | PA99N2-1 | 33.8 | 35.0 | 23.4 | 30.7 | ||||||
| 12 | PA99N82-4 | 36.8 | 35.9 | 22.4 | 31.7 | ||||||
| Average | 29.8 | 29.4 | 21.5 | ||||||||
| § maximum rating possible = 38 | |||||||||||
| §§ Values for the indicated evaluation are lower than the rejection level. | |||||||||||
| Overall Postharvest Performance of Clones Compared to Russet Burbank. | |||||||||||
| Clone | WA | ID | OR | Average | |||||||
| 1 | Ranger Russet | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 3 | A0008-1TE | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 4 | A97066-42LB | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 5 | AC96052-1Ru | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 6 | AO96141-3 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 7 | AOTX95265-4Ru | L | L | L | L | ||||||
| 8 | CO97087-2Ru | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 9 | CO98067-7Ru | L | L | L | L | ||||||
| 10 | CO98368-2Ru | H | L | H | H | ||||||
| 11 | PA99N2-1 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 12 | PA99N82-4 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| H= Higher than Russet Burbank | |||||||||||
| L= Lower than Russet Burbank | |||||||||||
| S = Same as Russet Burbank | |||||||||||