| WA | ID | OR | 3 State av. | ||||||||
| Rating | Rating | Rating | Rating | ||||||||
| Clone | Total § | Discard §§ | Total § | Discard §§ | Total § | Discard §§ | Total | ||||
| 1 | Ranger Russet | 36.0 | 31.2 | 20.4 | 29.2 | ||||||
| 2 | Russet Burbank | 29.3 | 23.1 | 16.3 | 22.9 | ||||||
| 3 | A96814-65LB | 32.5 | 32.5 | 25.8 | 30.3 | ||||||
| 4 | A98345-1 | 32.7 | 36.4 | 31.2 | 33.4 | ||||||
| 5 | A00324-1 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 21.5 | 29.4 | ||||||
| 6 | A00646-4 | 25.8 | 23.5 | 10.3 | Sp. Gr. | 19.9 | |||||
| 7 | AO96305-3 | 36.8 | 31.9 | 28.7 | 32.5 | ||||||
| 8 | AO96365-2 | 33.3 | 35.4 | 21.3 | 30.0 | ||||||
| 9 | AO98282-5 | 32.4 | 34.3 | 27.5 | 31.4 | ||||||
| 10 | AO00057-2 | 34.4 | 32.2 | 30.3 | 32.3 | ||||||
| 11 | PA98NM25-5 | 32.7 | 32.7 | 26.1 | 30.5 | ||||||
| 12 | PA00N14-2 | 35.9 | 29.1 | 24.3 | 29.8 | ||||||
| 13 | PA00N32-4 | 26.6 | 24.0 | 15.0 | 21.9 | ||||||
| Average | 32.4 | 30.7 | 23.0 | 28.7 | |||||||
| § maximum rating possible = 38 | |||||||||||
| §§ Values for the indicated evaluation are lower than the rejection level. | |||||||||||
| Overall Postharvest Performance of Clones Compared to Russet Burbank. | |||||||||||
| Clone | WA | ID | OR | Average | |||||||
| 1 | Ranger Russet | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 3 | A96814-65LB | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 4 | A98345-1 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 5 | A00324-1 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 6 | A00646-4 | L | H | L | L | ||||||
| 7 | AO96305-3 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 8 | AO96365-2 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 9 | AO98282-5 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 10 | AO00057-2 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 11 | PA98NM25-5 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 12 | PA00N14-2 | H | H | H | H | ||||||
| 13 | PA00N32-4 | L | H | L | L | ||||||
| H= Higher than Russet Burbank | |||||||||||
| S= Same as Russet Burbank | |||||||||||
| L= Lower than Russet Burbank | |||||||||||