|
It's hard to know why Europeans
suddenly expanded over the globe with such rapidity and such
ferocity. At the beginning of the fifteenth century, the
world was a fairly small and contained place for Europeans.
While they knew about far-flung areas such as China and
southern Africa, their world view was still narrowly focused
on Europe and the Mediterranean. Within two hundred years,
Europeans would be all over the world with settlements on
every continent except Australia and Antarctica. By 1600,
most of the coastline of the Americas would be under the
domination of Europeans as well as all the major cities in
eastern Africa. How did this happen? How did Europeans
suddenly end up all over the world? And how did this change
the European world view? |
|
For Europeans, the discovery of the Americas did not merely challenge their ideas of world geography, it also fundamentally changed their view of history. From the time of early Christianity all through Middle Ages, Europeans thought of history as an ordered and rational affair. History was by and large understood as salvation history; the larger meaning of history was the salvation of humanity in a Christian sense. The meaning of all historical events could be determined by correlating those historical events to events or sayings in the New Testament which served as a kind of decoder ring; this way of understanding human experience and history is called typology. The discovery of the New World, however, made the Europeans realize that there was an entirely different human history being played out on the new continent. Not only was this history different from European history, it was unknown and unknowable, for the Europeans could not decipher the writings they encountered. The salvation model of history, then, could no longer apply to human experience since an entire human history had taken place outside the context of salvation history. This crisis in historical understanding would lead Europeans to think of history in different ways and eventually led to the Englightenment view of history, that is, history as progress. Richard Hooker |
|
|
|